Thursday, July 2, 2009

Las Vegas

Welcome to Vegas
Where there are lots of people
losing their money

Good thing I'm not one of those people. Vegas is awesome. Goal: Stay at every hotel in Vegas before I die--yes, even the ramshackle Fisherman Inn that looks to have only 6 rooms. I'll go to that one when I'm ready to die.

Vegas--definitely not rated G.

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Yale Vs Harvard

An unofficial compilation:

0) Harvard student production: http://youtube.com/watch?v=_ExMosm66gA
Yale student production: http://youtube.com/watch?v=GH0SoDcR3_A
1) Harvard students think so: http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=512326
2) When you search "Why Harvard is better than Yale" you get many results that say "Why Yale is better than Harvard" including the link above.
3) Yale has its own forest
4) With a mascot named "Handsome Dan," what does that say about the students?
5) Harvard doesn't even have a real mascot
6) Yale is a smaller school--more intimacy!
7) In terms of football: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/ben_reiter/11/21/yale.harvard/index.html
8) A very thorough post: http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/yale-university/633536-repost-why-i-chose-yale-over-harvard.html
9) True story: http://www.yaledailynews.com/articles/printarticle/9340
10) Yale has a less confusing, less noisy, more beautiful campus
11) The campus is also smaller, and so you have to travel less between classes/activities
12) VERY easy to do research at Yale--basically, you just go to a professor and ask! (You may be turned down, but there's really no complicated process.)
13) Yale is pretty much Hogwarts. 'Nuff said.
14) New Haven has a HUGE variety of ethnic foods from all over the world. And even fast food if you want it.
15) Late night snack bars. Greasy, and delicious.
16) Yale, when anagramed, becomes Lyae, which is probably some lost language's equivalent of "awesome."
17) Not nearly as cold, but with enough snowfall to be fun!
18) Weeklong Thanksgiving break, and no finals in the middle of winter break.
19) According to one Yale student, "I have tighter connections with Harvard professors than Harvard students have with the same professors." This was because he was introduced to a couple through a Yale professor. An exaggeration, probably, but enlightening.
20) George W. Bush may have gone to Yale for undergrad, but he went to Harvard Business School to get his MBA after being rejected from UT-Austin's law school. Which goes to show, Yale taught him how to party--but Harvard taught him how to ruin the economy.

This is a pretty hasty list. But, I think, objectively and unbiasedly, true.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

WWADIHWG

I really want to learn more languages. Honestly, I do. I think it would be incredibly cool to know like 10 languages and be able to just bust out awesome phrases at will, such as 당신은 천사 처럼 이쁘다. Guys, I'm kidding. Ladies, I'm not. If you're a non-Korean speaker like me--make a Korean friend by copy and pasting this and asking them what it means.

But, the point is, it's so gosh-darned difficult to learn languages! Like, seriously. Since language is so integral to our lives as humans (especially now that we are globalized humans), why can't we catch a break? Shouldn't we get cut some slack on this? The answer to these rhetorical questions, by the way, is a resounding NO. Just put in some effort, you lazy bastards.

Just kidding. The answer, in fact, should be YES.

The world, as it is right now, is flawed. My vision is as follows:

Everyone should have language coded for genetically. What does this mean? This means that whatever percent of your DNA belongs to a culture/race/ethnicity/group/whatever that speaks a certain language, then you should naturally/genetically be fluent for that percentage in that particular language! For example, if I am 100% Chinese, then I should naturally know, when I am born, perfect Chinese, from grammar to vocabulary to slang. If someone else were, say, 4/7 Chinese and 3/7 Mexican, then he should be automatically 4/7 fluent in Chinese and 3/7 fluent in Portuguese (just kidding, I know they actually speak Mexicanese.)

Of course, this doesn't meant that the natural percentage is their cap! Of course not--that would suck more than our current situation. This initial fluency is merely the starting point! Once the basics are programmed, it would be but a trifle to brush up and finish learning.

And the process is fair, too! Those who are less genetically diverse would start out with greater fluency in their particular genetic languages, but those who are more genetically diverse would start out with a greater variety of fluency. It's a win/win. If you want your kids to learn more languages, just go out and mix cultures. It's even good for the world!

Basically, in conclusion, evolution has failed us--we didn't evolve this ability. God has failed us--he didn't instill within us this ability. I propose the fairest and most productive solution--an election for the position of God. And, as the (I nominate myself) only candidate thus far in the race, I promise that, if elected, I will immediately enact Divine Order #1, which states that all organisms will automatically and naturally be fluent in the exact portion as that particular language's influence (culturally, ethnically, racially, and so forth) in his or her genome.

If you want the world to be a better place, just think--What Would Allen Do If He Were God?

Yes, I can.

Monday, December 29, 2008

In latest initiatives for the advancement of internet and music Justice...

...the RIAA decides to sue a chronically ill girl (suffering from pancreatitis and depression) whose single mother makes $8.25 an hour, who is also facing mounting medical bills. The 19-year-old girl was, shockingly, unable to make it to court, earning the RIAA a default settlement of $8000. Apparently, she shared a criminally large amount of songs (10) over the internet while hospitalized.

Truly, RIAA has made the first bold step into a new era of internet justice. To avoid the same fate as the aforementioned miscreant, check out http://www.riaa.com/ -- you can download your very own "Young People, Music & the Internet: A Guide For Parents & Teachers About Digital Music & Downloading"

Make sure you check the link first though! Just in case you download a pirated copy.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

On Fighting Wars

So I was sitting in StraTechWar today (that's Strategy, Technology, and War), listening to this dude (I think he was an admiral or something) talking about the Nuclear Propulsion Program--basically putting nuclear engines and such into warships. This is pretty cool, especially since the first nuclear powered submarine was named USS Nautilus, which is the same name as Captain Nemo's famous ship. Yeah, it sounds like a dumb reason to like it, but I'm a fan of Nemo. The fish.

Anyway, I was sitting and thinking--why do we need such destructive weapons anyway? There's got to be better ways of fighting wars, that aren't as bloody or violent. I came up with several ways that I think should be considered in all future combat. The future of battle lies not with super lasers that can curve all the way around the world and hit yourself in the back (although that would be awesome for about 0.13 seconds before the laser travels around and hits you in the back.) No--the future lies in these:

1) Laughing Gas.

I was thinking about Harry Potter, and it hit me--there were so many ways to take down Death Eaters without using lethal curses, such as Rictumsempra (the tickling spell, which Harry used to pwn Draco in Book Two.) Why can't we just douse the other side with laughing gas, and have them laugh themselves into incapacitation? This way, even if the wind blew the gas back toward our own side, we wouldn't hurt ourselves. True, gas warfare is prohibited by the Geneva Convention but come on--laughing gas is nothing like mustard gas. It won't even kill anyone! Unless they laugh themselves to death, which is unlikely.

Convinced of the feasibility of such a method, I immediately conducted some research (e.g. Wikipedia) and learned, to my intense dismay, that laughing gas DID NOT MAKE YOU LAUGH. WTF?????????? It's just the colloquial name of nitrous oxide, which is an anesthetic that gives you a happy feeling ("euphoric.") I felt so cheated. But upon further reading, I realized that it could still work. If you make the other side so happy that they don't want to fight, then you basically win anyway! In true wannabe Mythbuster style, I am now declaring this solution PLAUSIBLE.

2) Tranquilizing Rain

I got this from Naruto (DON'T LAUGH.) There was this one chapter where this dude throws up an umbrella thereby causing a deadly rain of needles to pepper his enemy. Well, instead of raining needles, what if we use a cannon to shoot up lots of tranquilizing darts into the sky, and have them rain down on the opponenet? Falling darts are really hard to dodge. And since people wear helmets (usually) the darts would probably hit something like a shoulder. Gravity and impact might cause some broken bones, but that's better than death right?

But, upon further consideration, the darts would have to be shot pretty damn high, and who knows what kind of havoic they could cause. So instead of darts, I propose a tranquilzing rain. Launch giant bags of tranquilizer fluid into the air, then shoot them with a sniper or something, and have it rain tranquilfication (is this a word?) Much better than exploding shrapnel or fireballs of doom.

3) Foam Wars

This is pretty self-explanatory. Have airplanes drop foam bombs. They explode into awesome foaminess, encompassing the opponenet and disabling their movement and willingness to fight. Better yet, make the foam smell nice--it's proven that nice smells promote feelings of contentment. Even if this is taken to extremes, the foam still wouldn't really hurt anyone. What a great idea!

4) Ball Pit of Doom. And By Doom I Mean Awesomeness.

This is a bit trickier. It takes some more time. The opponents have to be surrounded for this to work. Perfect for fighting against guerilla forces where you know they are there, but you don't know where they are. First! You erect giant walls around an area. Or a giant fence. Same thing. Then you air drop lots and lots of ball pit balls into the area, filling it up! You only need fences about 5 feet high or so. The balls should be dropped in bags that explode (BUT WITH NO FIRE OR SHOCKWAVES) upon impact with the ground. This would quickly fill up the area with balls. This might even be seen as a gesture of peace, since you are providing them with fun stuff to play with.

5) The Bubble Gun

Sound familiar? It should. The signature attack of our favorite little turtle--no, not Squirt or Crush, but rather SQUIRTLE!!! This isn't as crazy as it sounds. Okay, maybe it is, but it's awesome. Create a gun that shoots out bubbles filled with laughing gas and shoot bubbles at the enemy! This will be perfect--it will simulate my concept of laughing gas. They will be so busy laughing at the bubbles that when the bubbles pop, they'll be put to sleep (literally, not euphemistically [is that a word?]) There can be a giant fan set up to help blow the bubbles. Even if bubbles are shot down, the gas will still be there and be blown to where it needs to go.

Wouldn't this type of warfare be awesome??!!?? I, for one, would totally be willing to be bombed by foam and encased in a ball pit.

I will leave you with this thought--the best method of warfare, but one that I fear will never be given serious consideration. Launch towards your opponent lots of heart shaped boxes of chocolate. What kind of heartless individual would shoot at someone who sent mass amounts of heart shapped boxes of chocolate? Exactly--nobody would.

As the adage goes, make love not war.

Friday, September 26, 2008

Hilarious

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/26/navarrette.obama.mccain/index.html?eref=rss_topstories

This guy is so deluded. Political affiliation aside, McCain did nothing. And his "campaign suspension" was nominal and a farce. Who still sees his ads running?

I don't even want to talk about what a joke McCain's campaign suspension stunt is. He admitted that he knew nothing about economics, and then went to the meeting and said nothing, except to disrupt the process at the end.

If McCain's declaration isn't political grandstanding, I don't know what is. Anyway, I wasn't actually going to make any comments about the article, and let it stand on its own hilarity, but I couldn't resist.

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Gun Control

This is why we don't need gun control.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/05/17/church.shootings/index.html?iref=werecommend

A seemingly non-certifiably-insane guy with a specific motive.